Just to compare details and color in that crop tim, i have a different viewlook at my pics: the DNG opened with CR isi dont know how to say in englishthe red-magenta are blownthe dng opened in pentax utility shows a lot more details. (i work in sRGB, not adobeRGB).I find it really fast and friendly compared to many other programs (i mean lightroom, pentax digital camera utility, DxO optics pro, Silkypix, etc.).
Adobe Labs Dng Profile Editor For Infrared White Balance How To Say InIt has no rivals, on my macbook pro it is absolutely faster than others. BUT i found a lot of differences comparing colors (not just tone, but definition inside an object with similar colors) from a DNG using camera raw vs pentax digital camera utility 4. You can check (without the camera) the problem here (see the colorcheker chart): I can post examples of what i mean speaking of definition inside an object with similar colors. I always use the embedded camera profile in camera raw, finding it more similar to the pentax software. Is there a way i can bypass this issue using pentax digital software is really boringits unfriendly, SLOW, with bad light adjustments and interface. It crashes a lot. I tried opening the DNG with pentax software and converting it to tiff: the colors are ok, but you lose a lot adjusting light etc. All i found its the.icc sRGB profile searching the pentax digital folderbut i dont know if it can be helpfull. There is always a conversion stage, which depends on the viewereditor and its defaults. The only significant difference is the EXIF data and the way the viewer interprets that data. The manufacturers software usually follows the original EXIF data more faithfully, although that may not be the best setting for the final results. That software may do additional image processing, including error correction (bad pixels), CA reduction, distortion correction and sharpening. You should consider using one program that does it all and keeps the process under your control, like Lightroom or Aperture. But as soon as you use any other 3rd party raw converter, it uses its unique color engine and whatever settings are default to build a new, high quality preview so they dont match. ![]() You can use DNG profiles and various new default settings in ACR or LR to produce a closer match to the camera rendering if you wish. But the disconnect in the two renderings initially is to be expected. I can tell you with certainty that the ACR version is visually more Accurate to the actual target (which I have right in front of me) than Pentaxs. However, the Adobe version is technically a more linearized rendering meaning all tones and colors are rendered equally which gives a flat preview. I took a screenshot of the ACR preview of the dpreview CCchart, converted to AdobeRGB and applied in CS3 Levels 16 to black and 235 to highlight sliders to normalize contrast according to human vision with no clipping and got perfect contrast while maintaining relational balance with regards to hue, saturation and luminance among all the patches. Now THATs a linear rendering which is what I WISHED I got with my old Pentax K100D even using Adobes DNG Profile Wizard. Thats nothing like what was demonstrated in that dpreview CCchart. In fact I get a lot of shots like that even with my Pentax K100D shooting jpegs, see here: Also which DNG are you talking about. The DNG straight out of Pentax camera or a Raw PEF converted to DNG using Adobes DNG converter. I than opened the DNG in pentax utility, saved in tiff and opened the tiff with camera raw. Just to compare details and color in that crop tim, i have a different viewlook at my pics: the DNG opened with CR isi dont know how to say in englishthe red-magenta are blownthe dng opened in pentax utility shows a lot more details. RGB, not adobeRGB).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |